The schematic structure of the artist's life is displayed a few times in the film. There isn't really much mention of the first few stages of the schematic structure, seeing as the film beings with Pollock already well into his thirties. In the "youth" stage, the artist is supposed to be discovered by a recognized artist or artistic authority. For Pollock, this figure is Peggy Guggenheim who gives him his first major commission. He develops his style only after he created the large-scale mural for the entrance of Peggy Guggenheim's townhouse. This development of his style is characterized by both a literal and figurative "breakthrough" moment, displayed by Pollock violently "breaking through" the wall in his apartment to make more room for the enormous canvas he will be using to paint Guggenheim's mural. It is here that Pollock develops his "action" style painting series. The "youth" stage is also portrayed through the comparison of Pollock's earlier works which look markedly like Picasso's art work and his drip-painting can technique which ultimately made him famous. The "maturity" stage can also refer to his major commission from Guggenheim as well as his first one-man-show, "Art of the Century", at Guggenheim's gallery in 1943. Clement Greenberg, as well known art critic of the time, also made comments on Pollock's art, calling his paintings "muddy" and with "pretentious titles." This recognition, albeit unsavory, situates Pollock's art career in the "maturity" stage as well.
Plato's Ion, which is a classical view of artistic inspiration, is comparable to the way in which Pollock's inspiration was documented in the film and in his life. In Plato's Ion, Socrates describes the artistic process and inspiration as a moment or act when there is a "divinity moving in you." Additionally, the presence of a muse is an integral part of the inspiration process for the artist or poet, according to Socrates. In Pollock's life, the figure of the muse can be found in his wife and long time supporter and advocate, Lee Krasner. Krasner is not so much a muse in the literal sense, as she is more a source of inspiration for Pollock through her intense devotion to him as an artistic genius and to his artwork. She even goes as far as to sacrifice her own painting career and passion for art, in order for Pollock to fully realize and successfully accomplish his artistic career and pursuits.
3 comments:
Interpretation is so key in each individuals personal experiences. Whether viewing gallery art or film, interpretation can truly distinguish perspective. While you viewed Pollock in the opening of the film as calm and put together, I saw a completely different man altogether. In the entirety of what we viewed in class, be it Pollock the alcoholic or Pollock the genius, I do not think he looked any more uncomfortable than he did in the first scene. Both the score, the framing of the shot, and the expression on Harris' face just seemed to imply a complete disorientation and discomfort on Pollock's part. Now admittedly, I've never seen this film before, so maybe once we circle back around to that scene later on, I'll interpret it a different way. I just thought he looked like he was worse of in the first scene than in any other of the parts we viewed so far
I like the use of the word muse. In my blog, I discuss artistic inspiration, but muse is an appropriate word considering the reading is "classical" and the idea of the muse comes from classical context. I found it interesting that you felt that Lee Krasner was an inspiration for him. In the film, he seems to be in his own world and doesn't pay her enough attention, therefore I was surprised you got the impression that some of his paintings were inspired by her. On the other hand, I do see how this could be true. She is the one that pushed him to publicize his art and encourages him to paint. In that sense, she could very well be his muse.
I also like the muse comparison. Also, Ashley's comment about Pollock looking most uncomfortable in the first scene is very insightful.
Post a Comment